2 Ways to Protect NJ Reiki Now

UPDATE ON NJ ASSEMBLY BILL 2461: The bill was dropped from the agenda for the public hearing on March 20 just as suddenly as it was added. We’ve not gotten any straight answers about what’s happening, but the flood of emails in opposition was noted. WELL DONE, REIKI COMMUNITY! And we can’t assume it’s died.

The Massachusetts licensing attempt has showed up in 5 iterations, and the same could happen in New Jersey. Please join my Protect Reiki list to stay informed. Read the original post below to be prepared for next time. Even better, write emails to the Health Committee using the suggestions and contacts below. The more emails in opposition they get, the better.

___________________________________

Your immediate help is needed to protect NJ Reiki. The legislature has scheduled a public hearing for Monday, March 20. That’s very short notice and it would be SO POWERFUL for the Reiki community to SHOW UP BIG.

protect new jersey reikiWe need your oral or written testimony to oppose NJ Assembly Bill 2461

Your participation matters, and I’ll walk you through how you can help protect NJ Reiki. The time is NOW.

Please show up to Protect NJ Reiki by emailing written testimony or by appearing in person at the public hearing in Trenton on Monday, March 20.

Before we go into the details of how you can do that, let’s back up a step in case you didn’t read my earlier article.

What is New Jersey Assembly Bill 2461?

NJ Assembly Bill 2461 establishes a “Natural Health and Vitality Task Force.” Let me be clear: that’s not a good thing.

Why not? Because it’s the first step toward New Jersey defining what Reiki practice is, how you have to practice, what you have to teach (and not teach). That’s what happens when a state decides to require a license to practice. That’s what we need to protect NJ Reiki from.

A license won’t enhance the credibility of Reiki practice. Rather, it will strip the deeply personal, spiritual roots of the practice and create soulless, sterile, homogenous rituals.

2 ways you can protect NJ Reiki

You can share your opposition to NJ Assembly Bill 2461 by showing up in person in Trenton on Monday, March 20.

Or you can register to submit written testimony.

Both options to protect NJ Reiki are effective, so if you’re not able to drop everything and attend live, please take the time to write out your opposition (guidance for composing oral or written testimony below).

Details of the live public hearing 

DATE: Monday, March 20, 2023

TIME: 10:00 AM ET

LOCATION: State House Annex, 145 W State Street, Committee Room 11, 4th Floor, Trenton, NJ

REGISTER HERE TO ATTEND AND SPEAK (your testimony is limited to a few minutes). After registering, scroll down for suggested points. Be sure to prepare your testimony in advance. Don’t wing it.

How to submit written testimony to protect NJ Reiki

REGISTER HERE TO SUBMIT WRITTEN TESTIMONYFill out the form. If you’re not a resident of NJ, change the default state to yours. Look below the form and check the box that says “oppose.” Then tap the “Submit” button to email your opposition.

If registration has maxed out and you cannot send an email through that link, please email your opposition directly to the Assembly Health Committee at olsaideahe@njleg.org.

You can email the individual committee members as well. You can get their contacts here. Scroll down to Assembly Health.  

Your email can be as simple as “I oppose Assembly 2461,” or continue reading for suggestions for writing more detailed comments.

Preparing your opposition testimony (oral or written)

Keep your comments succinct and respectful, while clearly stating your points. This is not the time to educate about Reiki practice, and I encourage you to speak of “Reiki practice” rather than “Reiki energy,” which would likely discredit you. Even liberal legislators are somewhat conservative, and they might be prejudiced against the New Age use of “energy.” It shouldn’t matter, but why risk it?

Remember, your elected officials want your vote, so they’re interested in your position. Nonetheless, it makes sense to make it easy for them to not just register your opposition, but to understand your concerns.

Even if you’re a Reiki professional, it’s best to speak as a consumer or home practitioner. The legislators are more impressed by what regular constituents want than by what could be seen as commercial or guild interests. If you ask them to protect your profession, they might decide your profession should be regulated.

You can, however, point out that unnecessary government regulation hurts an already weak economy, and that the hardship is borne mostly by already marginalized populations such as people of color and single mothers.

Other points to consider making:

  • The proposed task force would not include Reiki practitioners and teachers.
  • The National Institutes of Health (NIH) website states clearly, “Reiki hasn’t been shown to have any harmful effects. The only reason for licensing is to protect the public, which doesn’t need to be protected from non-invasive holistic practices.
  • Reiki is a spiritual practice traditionally passed directly from master to student.
  • No other spiritual practices are specified in the bill. Why is Reiki practice being singled out?
  • No one knows how many different styles of Reiki practice there are but common estimates fall between 100-150. Each style has its own lineage and practice forms, none of which would be represented on the task force.
  • No one on the proposed task force has the requisite expertise to set or recommend licensing standards for Reiki practice. How can there be licensing without representation?
  • Reiki professionals are often boot-strapped solopreneurs. Unwarranted occupational licensing is known to dampen the economy by forcing qualified solo practitioners out of business, depriving their families of needed income. The result is that there are fewer qualified Reiki practitioners, which reduces public access at a time when we want to empower citizens in terms of health and well-being. Those Reiki professionals who able to pay the increased costs of licensing would need to pass those costs on to their clients and students in the form of higher fees, further restricting public access to care.

Sample email

Reiki master Rita Glassman led the opposition to the licensing attempt in Massachusetts. I’ve lightly edited her sample email below.

Subject Line on Email: Written Testimony in Opposition to A2461

To:  The Assembly Health Committee
Re:  Opposition to A2461 “An Act to Establish a Natural Health and Vitality Task Force”

Dear Chair Conaway, Vice-Chair Lampitt, and Members of the Committee:

I am a Reiki practitioner and reside in New Jersey (or other state – please name.)

I urge you to oppose A2461. I have great concern about how this bill could negatively affect my health and well-being, and reduce the holistic healthcare choices that support me and my family.

This bill empowers the proposed Natural Health and Vitality Task Force to set standards for the education, qualifications and training for Reiki practitioners and teachers, and to recommend legislative action.  

INSERT: Complete your letter with statements from the points shared above. Ideally, include a personal story. Say why the issue is important to you and how it affects you, your family member, or your community. Personal stories have the greatest impact on your legislators. Keep your letter to one page.

Please vote against A2461.

I greatly appreciate a response. Thank you for your time and consideration of my concerns.

Sincerely,
Your name and credentials
Street address
City, State, Zip code
Phone
Email

YOU HAVE THE POWER TO PROTECT NJ REIKI. PLEASE EXERCISE THAT POWER NOW, AND SHARE WHAT YOU’VE DONE, OR ASK A QUESTION, IN A COMMENT BELOW.

Sign up here to be on my Protect Reiki list. I’ll only email you when there is a legislative update or action to take, such as this Protect NJ Reiki initiative. If you’re looking for more credible Reiki support, I email my ReikiUpdate list weekly. You’re welcome to join either or both lists.

93 Shares

3 thoughts on “2 Ways to Protect NJ Reiki Now”

  1. To: The Assembly Health Committee

    Re: Opposition to A2461 “An Act to Establish a Natural Health and Vitality Task Force”

    Dear Chair Conaway, Vice-Chair Lampitt, and Members of the Committee:

    I am a Reiki practitioner residing in Arizona. I urge you to oppose A2461. I am concerned that passage of this bill will set an undesired precedent for the Reiki practitioners of the US. Regulation is unnecessary for Reiki practice, as it is a spiritual practice and poses no harm to the public we serve. It feels as though this bill is being fast-tracked; I am concerned that the formation of a Natural Health and Vitality Task Force setting standards regarding Reiki practice will adversely affect Reiki practitioners in all states. Regulation is not necessary for Reiki practice, it just isn’t.

    Again, please vote against A2461.

    Thank you for your time and consideration of my concerns.

    Sincerely,

    Leigh Henry, White Star Reiki Master Teacher
    65 Arch Dr.
    Sedona, AZ 86351
    281-733-2785
    sedonablessings@gmail.com

    sedonablessings.com

  2. Written Testimony in Opposition to A2461
    To:  The Assembly Health Committee
    Re:  Opposition to A2461 “An Act to Establish a Natural Health and Vitality Task Force”

    Dear Chair Conaway, Vice-Chair Lampitt, and Members of the Committee:

    I am a Reiki practitioner currently residing in New Hampshire. Originally from New Jersey, I frequent New Jersey regularly. I urge you to oppose A2461. I have great concern about how this bill could negatively affect our health and well-being while reducing the holistic healthcare choices that support me, my family and friends.

    A2461 empowers the proposed Natural Health and Vitality Task Force to set standards for the education, qualifications and training for Reiki practitioners and teachers, and to recommend legislative action. I am concerned that this bill is being pushed through too rapidly, thereby disallowing timely response from the public, practitioners and teachers. Why is Reiki practice the sole focus of this proposed bill? The National Institute of Health (NIH) website clearly states that “Reiki hasn’t been shown to have any harmful effects.” If NIH sees no harm, why would there be a need to license a spiritual practice that is traditionally passed on directly from a master teacher to student? Why does the proposed task force not include Reiki
    practitioners and teachers? How can a group make decisions about a practice for which they are not trained?

    Governmental regulation, especially during these financially precarious times, would preclude people from learning and receiving Reiki who are already marginalized, especially single mothers and people of color. At a time when empowerment in health and well-being is vitally needed, A2461 would do the opposite. People are having a hard time making ends meet as it is. There would, as a consequence to the costs of licensure, be fewer Reiki teachers and practitioners. Why? Licensure costs that would become prohibitive for most solo entrepreneurs would then be passed on to consumers who are already struggling.

    I have been a Reiki recipient, practitioner and teacher since 1997. Reiki practice has helped me in many different ways. Here are some examples. When I cannot sleep at night, I practice Reiki on myself and am able to go to sleep without further difficulty. If I am stirred up mentally or emotionally, sitting still while practicing Reiki helps me to calm down, shift my mood, and then move forward in a more productive manner. Reiki practice even helped reduce swelling in one leg years ago when I was hit hard by a field hockey ball. I slapped my hands on the leg that hurt the most and was able to watch the rest of my daughter’s game. At the end of the game, the swelling was gone. The other leg for which I had not used Reiki had an egg-sized lump! I could provide so many more examples of the myriad ways in which Reiki has proven to be helpful to myself and others. Pretty much every day I am asked to send Reiki to someone in need. It is like a prayer. It’s something to be shared.

    Please vote against A2461.

    I greatly appreciate a response. Thank you for your time and consideration of my concerns.

    Sincerely,
    Barbara J. Woolley, Reiki Master, Ordained Minister, retired MSW
    7 Hilltop Place, New London, NH 03257
    603-748-5616
    barbjwoolley@gmail.com

    1. Barbara, thank you so much for emailing in opposition to New Jersey Assembly Bill 2461. You’ve given people a great example half of how easily this can be done.

      It would be so effective if the Reiki community were to flood the health committee with emails. Even something as simple as “I am opposed to NJ Assembly Bill 2461” is helpful.

      My only suggestion is to write “Reiki practice” instead of just “Reiki.” Remember, people will be reading this who have no idea what Reiki is, and that just makes it a little clearer for them.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top